MED. 7.67Discipline of desire
George Long · 1862EN · Long

TERMNature has not so mingled [the intelligence] with the composition of the body, as not to have allowed thee the power of DOGMAcircumscribing thyself and of bringing under subjection to thyself all that is thy own; for it is very possible to be a divine man and to be recognized as such by no one. Always bear this in mind; and another thing too, that DOGMAvery little indeed is necessary for living a happy life. And because thou hast despaired of becoming a dialectician and skilled in the knowledge of nature, do not for this reason renounce the hope of being both free and modest, and TERMsocial and obedient to God.

Original · ancient Greek

Ἡ φύσις οὐχ οὕτως συνεκέρασε σε τῷ συγκρίματι, ὡς μὴ ἐφεῖσθαι περιορίζειν ἑαυτὸν καὶ τὰ ἑαυτοῦ ὑφ’ ἑαυτῷ ποιεῖσθαι· λίαν γὰρ ἐνδέχεται θεῖον ἄνδρα γενέσθαι καὶ ὑπὸ μηδενὸς γνωρισθῆναι. τούτου μέμνησο ἀεὶ καὶ ἔτι ἐκείνου, ὅτι ἐν ὀλιγίστοις κεῖται τὸ εὐδαιμόνως βιῶσαι· καὶ μή, ὅτι ἀπήλπισας διαλεκτικὸς καὶ φυσικὸς ἔσεσθαι, διὰ τοῦτο ἀπογνῷς καὶ ἐλεύθερος καὶ αἰδήμων καὶ κοινωνικὸς καὶ εὐπειθὴς θεῷ.

Leopold · Teubner 1908
Commentary

Not welded past recall. Against the excuse "I am too caught up in the body to be my own master": TERMnature "has not so mingled (συνεκέρασε) you with the compound (σύγκριμα) as not to allow you to DOGMAcircumscribe yourself (περιορίζειν ἑαυτόν) and keep your own in your own power." The term περιορίζειν — "to draw a boundary around" — is the same as in 7.55 and 5.26: the ruling part can wall itself off from the bodily, however densely it is blended into it. Freedom is not the absence of the blend but the capacity to draw a line within it.

Godlike and unknown. The rift between fame and virtue, continuing 7.66: "it is quite possible to become a divine man (θεῖον ἄνδρα) and be recognized by no one." Greatness needs no witnesses (cf. 7.62). Hence the consolation of DOGMAsufficiency: "in the very least lies (ἐν ὀλιγίστοις κεῖται) the happy life" (εὐδαιμόνως βιῶσαι; cf. 2.5 — "how few things are needed for the smooth-flowing life").

Not a dialectician — then at least a human being. The close dispels intellectual snobbery: though you have "despaired of becoming a dialectician and natural philosopher" (διαλεκτικὸς καὶ φυσικός — a master of logic and of physics), that is no reason to give up the chief thing — to be "free, modest, TERMsocial, and obedient to god (εὐπειθὴς θεῷ)." Four things always in your power, unlike learning: ethics demands no talent, only resolve. The strict terms (φύσις, κοινωνικός) are in the text; εὐδαιμόνως is an adverb, not the lemma εὐδαιμονία (the link is in the commentary). The governing discipline is desire; the sustaining one, action.

DisciplineDiscipline of desire
Record added2026-07-16
Statuspublished
Discipline of desire

George Long · 1862· EN · Long

TERMNature has not so mingled [the intelligence] with the composition of the body, as not to have allowed thee the power of DOGMAcircumscribing thyself and of bringing under subjection to thyself all that is thy own; for it is very possible to be a divine man and to be recognized as such by no one. Always bear this in mind; and another thing too, that DOGMAvery little indeed is necessary for living a happy life. And because thou hast despaired of becoming a dialectician and skilled in the knowledge of nature, do not for this reason renounce the hope of being both free and modest, and TERMsocial and obedient to God.

Original · ancient Greek

Ἡ φύσις οὐχ οὕτως συνεκέρασε σε τῷ συγκρίματι, ὡς μὴ ἐφεῖσθαι περιορίζειν ἑαυτὸν καὶ τὰ ἑαυτοῦ ὑφ’ ἑαυτῷ ποιεῖσθαι· λίαν γὰρ ἐνδέχεται θεῖον ἄνδρα γενέσθαι καὶ ὑπὸ μηδενὸς γνωρισθῆναι. τούτου μέμνησο ἀεὶ καὶ ἔτι ἐκείνου, ὅτι ἐν ὀλιγίστοις κεῖται τὸ εὐδαιμόνως βιῶσαι· καὶ μή, ὅτι ἀπήλπισας διαλεκτικὸς καὶ φυσικὸς ἔσεσθαι, διὰ τοῦτο ἀπογνῷς καὶ ἐλεύθερος καὶ αἰδήμων καὶ κοινωνικὸς καὶ εὐπειθὴς θεῷ.

Leopold · Teubner 1908
Related4
Commentary

Not welded past recall. Against the excuse "I am too caught up in the body to be my own master": TERMnature "has not so mingled (συνεκέρασε) you with the compound (σύγκριμα) as not to allow you to DOGMAcircumscribe yourself (περιορίζειν ἑαυτόν) and keep your own in your own power." The term περιορίζειν — "to draw a boundary around" — is the same as in 7.55 and 5.26: the ruling part can wall itself off from the bodily, however densely it is blended into it. Freedom is not the absence of the blend but the capacity to draw a line within it.

Godlike and unknown. The rift between fame and virtue, continuing 7.66: "it is quite possible to become a divine man (θεῖον ἄνδρα) and be recognized by no one." Greatness needs no witnesses (cf. 7.62). Hence the consolation of DOGMAsufficiency: "in the very least lies (ἐν ὀλιγίστοις κεῖται) the happy life" (εὐδαιμόνως βιῶσαι; cf. 2.5 — "how few things are needed for the smooth-flowing life").

Not a dialectician — then at least a human being. The close dispels intellectual snobbery: though you have "despaired of becoming a dialectician and natural philosopher" (διαλεκτικὸς καὶ φυσικός — a master of logic and of physics), that is no reason to give up the chief thing — to be "free, modest, TERMsocial, and obedient to god (εὐπειθὴς θεῷ)." Four things always in your power, unlike learning: ethics demands no talent, only resolve. The strict terms (φύσις, κοινωνικός) are in the text; εὐδαιμόνως is an adverb, not the lemma εὐδαιμονία (the link is in the commentary). The governing discipline is desire; the sustaining one, action.

DisciplineDiscipline of desire
Record added2026-07-16
Statuspublished