TERM

τύχη

tychē
RU

случай, удача, фортуна

EN

chance, fortune

§ IDefinition

Tychē is what appears as chance — occurring without apparent cause and unforeseeable in advance by the individual agent. Aristotle, in Physics II 4–6, defines τύχη as "cause by accident" (κατὰ συμβεβηκός): it is real from the standpoint of the observer but does not form an independent ontological category. The Stoics, in the spirit of determinism, go further: τύχη is not "another power" alongside providence, but the name that a local observer gives to a causal connection inaccessible to him. There are no genuine "chances" in the Stoic cosmos; there are only events whose global motivation (TERMprovidence) is not open to the particular view.

§ IISource

Aristot. Phys. 195b31–197b37 (the conception of αἰτία κατὰ συμβεβηκός); SVF II 965–973 (the Stoic dissolution of τύχη as an independent power); Cic. De div. II 13–15; Plut. De Stoic. rep. 1050a–c. In Marcus: Med. 2.3; 4.26; 5.8 (the well-known "the threads of your life are woven together with the whole"); 9.28; 10.5.

§ IIINotes

In 02-03 τύχη appears in the first pair of formulae and is immediately disarmed: "what comes from chance is not without TERMnature or without an interweaving with what providence orders." This is a typically Stoic move: in place of a metaphysical dualism (providence vs. chance) it offers a perspectival one (the same reality under two angles of view). For Marcus there is an additional psychological effect: what I am inclined to describe as "this happened to me by chance" should be read as "this happened to me by TERMfate" — and is therefore to be accepted (amor-fati) rather than resisted.

TERM

τύχη

tychē
RU

случай, удача, фортуна

EN

chance, fortune

Appears in 3
Related 3
Sections 3

§ I Definition

Tychē is what appears as chance — occurring without apparent cause and unforeseeable in advance by the individual agent. Aristotle, in Physics II 4–6, defines τύχη as "cause by accident" (κατὰ συμβεβηκός): it is real from the standpoint of the observer but does not form an independent ontological category. The Stoics, in the spirit of determinism, go further: τύχη is not "another power" alongside providence, but the name that a local observer gives to a causal connection inaccessible to him. There are no genuine "chances" in the Stoic cosmos; there are only events whose global motivation (TERMprovidence) is not open to the particular view.

§ II Source

Aristot. Phys. 195b31–197b37 (the conception of αἰτία κατὰ συμβεβηκός); SVF II 965–973 (the Stoic dissolution of τύχη as an independent power); Cic. De div. II 13–15; Plut. De Stoic. rep. 1050a–c. In Marcus: Med. 2.3; 4.26; 5.8 (the well-known "the threads of your life are woven together with the whole"); 9.28; 10.5.

§ III Notes

In 02-03 τύχη appears in the first pair of formulae and is immediately disarmed: "what comes from chance is not without TERMnature or without an interweaving with what providence orders." This is a typically Stoic move: in place of a metaphysical dualism (providence vs. chance) it offers a perspectival one (the same reality under two angles of view). For Marcus there is an additional psychological effect: what I am inclined to describe as "this happened to me by chance" should be read as "this happened to me by TERMfate" — and is therefore to be accepted (amor-fati) rather than resisted.

Related 3
Appears in 3
1.8 From Apollonius​ I learned freedom of will and undeviating steadiness of purpose; and to look to nothing else, not even for a moment, except to reason; and to b… 2.3 All that is from the gods is full of Providence. That which is from fortune is not separated from nature or without an interweaving and involution with the thin… 2.17 Of human life the time is a point, and the substance is in a flux, and the perception dull, and the composition of the whole body subject to putrefaction, and t…
Copy Passage