TERM

πρόνοια

pronoia
RU

промысел, провидение, предусмотрение

EN

providence, forethought

§ IDefinition

Pronoia — Providence — is the rational, caring ordering of the cosmos. For the Stoics, πρόνοια is functionally identical with the Logos, with TERMthe nature of the whole, with Zeus, and with TERMfate: all these names denote one and the same reality under different aspects. Pronoia foregrounds the aspect of "fore-thought": the world is not the work of blind necessity, nor a chance constellation of atoms (as for the Epicureans), but is "foreseen" in advance for the good of the whole. The ethical weight: one should treat what happens as part of a single deliberate plan.

§ IISource

SVF II 1106–1186 (the doctrine of pronoia — an extensive corpus); the classical argument: Cic. De nat. deor. II 73–80 (Balbus' theory, after Chrysippus); Sen. De providentia (a whole treatise); Epict. Disc. 1.6, 1.16, 3.17. In Marcus: Med. 2.3; 2.11; 4.27; 6.44; 9.28; 12.5.

§ IIINotes

In 02-03 Marcus makes a key move: even what looks like the work of chance (TERMtyche) is in fact "not without nature and not without interweaving with what is administered by providence." The dualism "providence vs. chance" is thereby closed: the chancy is the same providential fabric seen from a local angle, where the causal connection is not evident to the observer. The ethical consequence follows at once — the acceptance of what happens as a good for the part (amor-fati). Stoic pronoia is not a theistic god in the manner of the Abrahamic traditions, but the immanent reason of the cosmos; see unity-of-cosmos.

TERM

πρόνοια

pronoia
RU

промысел, провидение, предусмотрение

EN

providence, forethought

Appears in 3
Related 4
Sections 3

§ I Definition

Pronoia — Providence — is the rational, caring ordering of the cosmos. For the Stoics, πρόνοια is functionally identical with the Logos, with TERMthe nature of the whole, with Zeus, and with TERMfate: all these names denote one and the same reality under different aspects. Pronoia foregrounds the aspect of "fore-thought": the world is not the work of blind necessity, nor a chance constellation of atoms (as for the Epicureans), but is "foreseen" in advance for the good of the whole. The ethical weight: one should treat what happens as part of a single deliberate plan.

§ II Source

SVF II 1106–1186 (the doctrine of pronoia — an extensive corpus); the classical argument: Cic. De nat. deor. II 73–80 (Balbus' theory, after Chrysippus); Sen. De providentia (a whole treatise); Epict. Disc. 1.6, 1.16, 3.17. In Marcus: Med. 2.3; 2.11; 4.27; 6.44; 9.28; 12.5.

§ III Notes

In 02-03 Marcus makes a key move: even what looks like the work of chance (TERMtyche) is in fact "not without nature and not without interweaving with what is administered by providence." The dualism "providence vs. chance" is thereby closed: the chancy is the same providential fabric seen from a local angle, where the causal connection is not evident to the observer. The ethical consequence follows at once — the acceptance of what happens as a good for the part (amor-fati). Stoic pronoia is not a theistic god in the manner of the Abrahamic traditions, but the immanent reason of the cosmos; see unity-of-cosmos.

Related 4
Appears in 3
2.3 All that is from the gods is full of Providence. That which is from fortune is not separated from nature or without an interweaving and involution with the thin… 2.4 Remember how long thou hast been putting off these things, and how often thou hast received an opportunity from the gods, and yet dost not use it. Thou must now… 2.11 Since it is possible that thou mayest depart from life this very moment, regulate every act and thought accordingly. But to go away from among men, if there are…
Copy Passage