MED. 6.44Discipline of desire
George Long · 1862EN · Long

If the gods have determined about me and about the things which must happen to me, DOGMAthey have determined well, for it is not easy even to imagine a deity without forethought; and as to doing me harm, why should they have any desire towards that? For what advantage would result to them from this or to the whole, which is the special object of their TERMprovidence? But if they have not determined about me individually, they have certainly determined about the whole at least, and the things which happen by way of sequence in this general arrangement I ought to DOGMAaccept with pleasure and to be content with them. But if they determine about nothing—which it is wicked to believe, or if we do believe it, let us neither sacrifice nor pray nor swear by them nor do anything else which we do as if the gods were present and lived with us—but if however the gods determine about none of the things which concern us, I am able to determine about myself, and I can inquire about that which is useful; and that is useful to every man which is conformable to his own constitution and nature. But my TERMnature is rational and social; and my city and country, so far as I am Antoninus, is Rome, but DOGMAso far as I am a man, it is the world. The things then which are useful to these cities are alone useful to me.

Original · ancient Greek

Εἰ μὲν οὖν ἐβουλεύσαντο περὶ ἐμοῦ καὶ τῶν ἐμοὶ συμβῆναι ὀφειλόντων οἱ θεοί, καλῶς ἐβουλεύσαντο· ἄβουλον γὰρ θεὸν οὐδὲ ἐπινοῆσαι ῥᾴδιον, κακοποιῆσαι δέ με διὰ τίνα αἰτίαν ἔμελλον ὁρμᾶν; τί γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἢ τῷ κοινῷ, οὗ μάλιστα προνοοῦνται, ἐκ τούτου περιεγένετο; εἰ δὲ μὴ ἐβουλεύσαντο κατ’ ἰδίαν περὶ ἐμοῦ, περί γε τῶν κοινῶν πάντως ἐβουλεύσαντο, οἷς κατ’ ἐπακολούθησιν καὶ ταῦτα συμβαίνοντα ἀσπάζεσθαι καὶ στέργειν ὀφείλω.

εἰ δʼ ἄρα περὶ μηδενὸς βουλεύονται (πιστεύειν μὲν οὐχ ὅσιον ἢ μηδὲ θύωμεν μηδὲ εὐχώμεθα μηδὲ ὀμνύωμεν μηδὲ τὰ ἄλλα πράσσωμεν ἃ παρ’ ἕκαστα ὡς πρὸς παρόντας καὶ συμβιοῦντας τοὺς θεοὺς πράσσομεν), εἰ δ’ ἄρα περὶ μηδενὸς τῶν καθ’ ἡμᾶς βουλεύονται, ἐμοὶ μὲν ἔξεστι περὶ ἐμαυτοῦ βουλεύεσθαι, ἐμοὶ δέ ἐστι σκέψις περὶ τοῦ συμφέροντος. συμφέρει δὲ ἑκάστῳ τὸ κατὰ τὴν ἑαυτοῦ κατασκευὴν καὶ φύσιν, ἡ δὲ ἐμὴ φύσις λογικὴ καὶ πολιτική.

Πόλις καὶ πατρὶς ὡς μὲν Ἀντωνίνῳ1 μοι ἡ Ῥώμη, ὡς δὲ ἀνθρώπῳ ὁ κόσμος. τὰ ταῖς πόλεσιν οὖν ταύταις ὠφέλιμα μόνα ἐστί μοι ἀγαθά.

Leopold · Teubner 1908
Commentary

A threefold disjunction. The passage runs through three possibilities for the gods' relation to events — and shows that on any of them the practical conclusion is one and the same. The governing discipline is desire (to accept what happens); the sustaining one is action (the rational-social nature → service to the cities).

(1) The gods provide for the individual. If the gods deliberated about me, they "DOGMAdeliberated well" (καλῶς ἐβουλεύσαντο): a god without forethought (ἄβουλος) cannot even be conceived, and they have no reason to harm me (what advantage to them or the Whole?). (2) The gods provide for the Whole. If not about me individually, then about the DOGMAWhole — and then what happens "by sequence" (κατ’ ἐπακολούθησιν) I ought to DOGMAwelcome and love (ἀσπάζεσθαι καὶ στέργειν) as a link in the common chain. (3) The gods provide for nothing. To believe this is impious (else sacrifice, prayer, oaths are meaningless); but even granting it, "I can deliberate about myself" — and beneficial to each is what accords with its own TERMconstitution and nature.

The rational-social nature and the two cities. All three branches converge on one point: "my TERMnature is rational and social" (λογικὴ καὶ πολιτική). Hence the famous formula of double citizenship: "as DOGMAAntoninus1, my country is Rome; as a human being, the cosmos." Rome is the particular polis of Marcus-the-emperor; the cosmopolis is the homeland of Marcus-the-human. And the criterion of the good: good for me is only what is useful to these two cities. Private benefit is dissolved into the common.

Parallels. The DOGMAcosmopolisMed. 4.4 (the sorites: common reason → common law → we are fellow-citizens); 03-11; the doctrines of DOGMAprovidence and DOGMAamor fati; the disjunction "providence or atoms" — 04-27; cf. 06-10. The rational-social nature — 05-29.

DisciplineDiscipline of desire
Record added2026-07-18
Statuspublished
Discipline of desire

George Long · 1862· EN · Long

If the gods have determined about me and about the things which must happen to me, DOGMAthey have determined well, for it is not easy even to imagine a deity without forethought; and as to doing me harm, why should they have any desire towards that? For what advantage would result to them from this or to the whole, which is the special object of their TERMprovidence? But if they have not determined about me individually, they have certainly determined about the whole at least, and the things which happen by way of sequence in this general arrangement I ought to DOGMAaccept with pleasure and to be content with them. But if they determine about nothing—which it is wicked to believe, or if we do believe it, let us neither sacrifice nor pray nor swear by them nor do anything else which we do as if the gods were present and lived with us—but if however the gods determine about none of the things which concern us, I am able to determine about myself, and I can inquire about that which is useful; and that is useful to every man which is conformable to his own constitution and nature. But my TERMnature is rational and social; and my city and country, so far as I am Antoninus, is Rome, but DOGMAso far as I am a man, it is the world. The things then which are useful to these cities are alone useful to me.

Original · ancient Greek

Εἰ μὲν οὖν ἐβουλεύσαντο περὶ ἐμοῦ καὶ τῶν ἐμοὶ συμβῆναι ὀφειλόντων οἱ θεοί, καλῶς ἐβουλεύσαντο· ἄβουλον γὰρ θεὸν οὐδὲ ἐπινοῆσαι ῥᾴδιον, κακοποιῆσαι δέ με διὰ τίνα αἰτίαν ἔμελλον ὁρμᾶν; τί γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἢ τῷ κοινῷ, οὗ μάλιστα προνοοῦνται, ἐκ τούτου περιεγένετο; εἰ δὲ μὴ ἐβουλεύσαντο κατ’ ἰδίαν περὶ ἐμοῦ, περί γε τῶν κοινῶν πάντως ἐβουλεύσαντο, οἷς κατ’ ἐπακολούθησιν καὶ ταῦτα συμβαίνοντα ἀσπάζεσθαι καὶ στέργειν ὀφείλω.

εἰ δʼ ἄρα περὶ μηδενὸς βουλεύονται (πιστεύειν μὲν οὐχ ὅσιον ἢ μηδὲ θύωμεν μηδὲ εὐχώμεθα μηδὲ ὀμνύωμεν μηδὲ τὰ ἄλλα πράσσωμεν ἃ παρ’ ἕκαστα ὡς πρὸς παρόντας καὶ συμβιοῦντας τοὺς θεοὺς πράσσομεν), εἰ δ’ ἄρα περὶ μηδενὸς τῶν καθ’ ἡμᾶς βουλεύονται, ἐμοὶ μὲν ἔξεστι περὶ ἐμαυτοῦ βουλεύεσθαι, ἐμοὶ δέ ἐστι σκέψις περὶ τοῦ συμφέροντος. συμφέρει δὲ ἑκάστῳ τὸ κατὰ τὴν ἑαυτοῦ κατασκευὴν καὶ φύσιν, ἡ δὲ ἐμὴ φύσις λογικὴ καὶ πολιτική.

Πόλις καὶ πατρὶς ὡς μὲν Ἀντωνίνῳ1 μοι ἡ Ῥώμη, ὡς δὲ ἀνθρώπῳ ὁ κόσμος. τὰ ταῖς πόλεσιν οὖν ταύταις ὠφέλιμα μόνα ἐστί μοι ἀγαθά.

Leopold · Teubner 1908
Marginalia1
Related5
Commentary

A threefold disjunction. The passage runs through three possibilities for the gods' relation to events — and shows that on any of them the practical conclusion is one and the same. The governing discipline is desire (to accept what happens); the sustaining one is action (the rational-social nature → service to the cities).

(1) The gods provide for the individual. If the gods deliberated about me, they "DOGMAdeliberated well" (καλῶς ἐβουλεύσαντο): a god without forethought (ἄβουλος) cannot even be conceived, and they have no reason to harm me (what advantage to them or the Whole?). (2) The gods provide for the Whole. If not about me individually, then about the DOGMAWhole — and then what happens "by sequence" (κατ’ ἐπακολούθησιν) I ought to DOGMAwelcome and love (ἀσπάζεσθαι καὶ στέργειν) as a link in the common chain. (3) The gods provide for nothing. To believe this is impious (else sacrifice, prayer, oaths are meaningless); but even granting it, "I can deliberate about myself" — and beneficial to each is what accords with its own TERMconstitution and nature.

The rational-social nature and the two cities. All three branches converge on one point: "my TERMnature is rational and social" (λογικὴ καὶ πολιτική). Hence the famous formula of double citizenship: "as DOGMAAntoninus1, my country is Rome; as a human being, the cosmos." Rome is the particular polis of Marcus-the-emperor; the cosmopolis is the homeland of Marcus-the-human. And the criterion of the good: good for me is only what is useful to these two cities. Private benefit is dissolved into the common.

Parallels. The DOGMAcosmopolisMed. 4.4 (the sorites: common reason → common law → we are fellow-citizens); 03-11; the doctrines of DOGMAprovidence and DOGMAamor fati; the disjunction "providence or atoms" — 04-27; cf. 06-10. The rational-social nature — 05-29.

DisciplineDiscipline of desire
Record added2026-07-18
Statuspublished