MOTIF

Drift and circling — two symptoms of a life without σκοπός

§ IImage

A double picture of aimless motion, both halves of which Marcus sets side by side in the single passage 02-07:

  • drift (ῥεμβόμενος, from ῥέμβεσθαι — "to wander, roam, ramble") — a boat carried away by the current; a leaf driven by the wind; a person whose attention is swept off in every direction by every external impression;
  • circling (περιφορά, from περιφέρομαι — "to be whirled," "to be carried round") — a carousel, an ant running on a wheel; a person worn out by activity in which there is plenty of motion and no direction.

Outwardly these pictures look opposed: drift is a passive, slack lack of will; circling is bustling activity. The Stoic diagnosis lays bare that they are one and the same defect — the absence of a TERMσκοπός. Without a centre, activity is as meaningless as inactivity: both are motion without a vector. This is a typically Stoic move: the outwardly different turns out to be structurally identical, once one looks at the disposition of the ruling part.

§ IISource

Med. 2.7 — the one place where Marcus sets both images side by side, as the two poles of one pathology: παῦσαι ῥεμβόμενος ("stop wandering") + τὴν ἑτέραν περιφορὰν φυλακτέον ("guard against the other kind of circling"). Each image recurs separately: Med. 2.16 (the one who lives without a σκοπός); 4.46 (Heraclitus and the river one cannot step into twice); 12.21 (aimless thoughts). The Greek background: Sen. Ep. 23.7 — "aliud agere et aliud, hoc est insanire" ("to do one thing and then another — this is what madness is"); Ep. 71.3 — "ignoranti quem portum petat nullus suus ventus est" ("for the one who does not know which port he is making for, no wind is his").

§ IIIUsage

In 02-07 the image is argumentative. Marcus does not say "define a σκοπός" in declarative form; he shows the alternative — two outwardly opposite pictures of a worthless existence — and leaves the reader to see for himself that both reduce to one. This is more effective than direct preaching: the patient diagnoses himself. The construction "two different symptoms, one cause" is characteristic of Marcus as a diagnostic instrument: see also the opposition of anger at others (02-01) and contempt for oneself (02-06) — both the result of a wrongly drawn boundary "mine / not mine" (dichotomy-of-control).

MOTIF

Drift and circling — two symptoms of a life without σκοπός

Appears in 4
Related 3
Sections 3

§ I Image

A double picture of aimless motion, both halves of which Marcus sets side by side in the single passage 02-07:

  • drift (ῥεμβόμενος, from ῥέμβεσθαι — "to wander, roam, ramble") — a boat carried away by the current; a leaf driven by the wind; a person whose attention is swept off in every direction by every external impression;
  • circling (περιφορά, from περιφέρομαι — "to be whirled," "to be carried round") — a carousel, an ant running on a wheel; a person worn out by activity in which there is plenty of motion and no direction.

Outwardly these pictures look opposed: drift is a passive, slack lack of will; circling is bustling activity. The Stoic diagnosis lays bare that they are one and the same defect — the absence of a TERMσκοπός. Without a centre, activity is as meaningless as inactivity: both are motion without a vector. This is a typically Stoic move: the outwardly different turns out to be structurally identical, once one looks at the disposition of the ruling part.

§ II Source

Med. 2.7 — the one place where Marcus sets both images side by side, as the two poles of one pathology: παῦσαι ῥεμβόμενος ("stop wandering") + τὴν ἑτέραν περιφορὰν φυλακτέον ("guard against the other kind of circling"). Each image recurs separately: Med. 2.16 (the one who lives without a σκοπός); 4.46 (Heraclitus and the river one cannot step into twice); 12.21 (aimless thoughts). The Greek background: Sen. Ep. 23.7 — "aliud agere et aliud, hoc est insanire" ("to do one thing and then another — this is what madness is"); Ep. 71.3 — "ignoranti quem portum petat nullus suus ventus est" ("for the one who does not know which port he is making for, no wind is his").

§ III Usage

In 02-07 the image is argumentative. Marcus does not say "define a σκοπός" in declarative form; he shows the alternative — two outwardly opposite pictures of a worthless existence — and leaves the reader to see for himself that both reduce to one. This is more effective than direct preaching: the patient diagnoses himself. The construction "two different symptoms, one cause" is characteristic of Marcus as a diagnostic instrument: see also the opposition of anger at others (02-01) and contempt for oneself (02-06) — both the result of a wrongly drawn boundary "mine / not mine" (dichotomy-of-control).

Related 3
Appears in 4
2.7 Do the things external which fall upon thee distract thee? Give thyself time to learn something new and good, and cease to be whirled around. But then thou must… 2.13 Nothing is more wretched than a man who traverses everything in a round, and pries into the things beneath the earth, as the poet says,​ and seeks by conjecture… 2.16 The soul of man does violence to itself, first of all, when it becomes an abscess and, as it were, a tumour on the universe, so far as it can. For to be vexed a… 3.14 No longer wander at hazard; for neither wilt thou read thy own memoirs, nor the acts of the ancient Romans and Hellenes, and the selections from books which tho…
Copy Passage