TERM

κακία

kakia
RU

порок, нравственная скверна

EN

vice, moral corruption

§ IDefinition

Kakia is the Stoic technical term for vice, the polar opposite of TERMvirtue. Where ἀρετή is διάθεσις τοῦ TERMἡγεμονικοῦ κατὰ λόγον — the disposition of the ruling part in accordance with reason — κακία is διάθεσις τοῦ ἡγεμονικοῦ παρὰ λόγον — its disposition contrary to reason. It is a state of the soul, not a single act (a single act is a ἁμάρτημα).

The four cardinal κακίαι are parallel to the four cardinal virtues:

As with virtue, kakia in the Stoics obeys the thesis of unity: a person vicious in one respect is vicious in all, because the four κακίαι are aspects of a single condition — disagreement with the Logos. All κακίαι are ψευδεῖς ὑπολήψεις — false evaluative judgments about good and evil.

§ IISource

SVF III 91–105 (Chrysippus on κακία as a state); III 256, 262 (passions as κρίσεις, vice as a settled false disposition); DL VII 93, 100–101; Stob. Ecl. II 58–60, 96 W; Cic. De fin. III 39; Tusc. IV 14, 28–32; LS 61. Kakia is not very frequent in Marcus (he prefers TERMkakon and TERMpathos), but appears in important places: Med. 2.1 (vice as ignorance of good and evil); 4.49; 05-35; 06-01 (κακίαν γὰρ οὐκ ἔχει — no vice in the cosmic Logos); 07-01 (what is κακία? — that which you have often seen); 07-31 (indifference to what lies between ἀρετή and κακία); 07-66 (Socrates not idly vexed at κακία); 07-71 (ridiculous to flee others' κακία — impossible — and not one's own); 08-55 (κακία harms only its bearer — who is free to be rid of it when he wills); 08-56 (a neighbour's κακία cannot become my κακόν); 09-02 (κακία is the true "plague" (λοιμός), more ruinous than any distemper of the air); 09-16 (a being's κακία is in ἐνέργεια, not in a passive state); 9.42; 12.27.

§ IIINotes

The radical Stoic thesis: between ἀρετή and κακία there is no middle ground. All human beings divide into sages (who possess all four virtues in full) and non-sages (who possess all four vices). There is no "in-between" (μέσος): the Stoics reject Aristotle's μεσότης (the doctrine of virtue as a mean). This yields a paradoxical consequence: almost everyone is vicious in the Stoic sense, because a sage appears more rarely than the phoenix (Sen. Ep. 42; SVF III 657).

The doctrine is softened by προκοπή — the gradual "progress" from folly toward wisdom. Most Stoics regarded themselves as προκόπτοντες — those making progress, not yet sages but moving in that direction. See Epict. Disc. 1.4 in full on προκοπή.

In Marcus, kakia occurs in the context of ignorance of TERMgood and TERMevil (02-01): vice is the consequence of incorrect evaluative knowledge, and therefore the right response to a vicious person is not anger but pity for his blindness (see also the image of moral blindness in 02-13).

TERM

κακία

kakia
RU

порок, нравственная скверна

EN

vice, moral corruption

Appears in12
Related5
Sections3

§ IDefinition

Kakia is the Stoic technical term for vice, the polar opposite of TERMvirtue. Where ἀρετή is διάθεσις τοῦ TERMἡγεμονικοῦ κατὰ λόγον — the disposition of the ruling part in accordance with reason — κακία is διάθεσις τοῦ ἡγεμονικοῦ παρὰ λόγον — its disposition contrary to reason. It is a state of the soul, not a single act (a single act is a ἁμάρτημα).

The four cardinal κακίαι are parallel to the four cardinal virtues:

As with virtue, kakia in the Stoics obeys the thesis of unity: a person vicious in one respect is vicious in all, because the four κακίαι are aspects of a single condition — disagreement with the Logos. All κακίαι are ψευδεῖς ὑπολήψεις — false evaluative judgments about good and evil.

§ IISource

SVF III 91–105 (Chrysippus on κακία as a state); III 256, 262 (passions as κρίσεις, vice as a settled false disposition); DL VII 93, 100–101; Stob. Ecl. II 58–60, 96 W; Cic. De fin. III 39; Tusc. IV 14, 28–32; LS 61. Kakia is not very frequent in Marcus (he prefers TERMkakon and TERMpathos), but appears in important places: Med. 2.1 (vice as ignorance of good and evil); 4.49; 05-35; 06-01 (κακίαν γὰρ οὐκ ἔχει — no vice in the cosmic Logos); 07-01 (what is κακία? — that which you have often seen); 07-31 (indifference to what lies between ἀρετή and κακία); 07-66 (Socrates not idly vexed at κακία); 07-71 (ridiculous to flee others' κακία — impossible — and not one's own); 08-55 (κακία harms only its bearer — who is free to be rid of it when he wills); 08-56 (a neighbour's κακία cannot become my κακόν); 09-02 (κακία is the true "plague" (λοιμός), more ruinous than any distemper of the air); 09-16 (a being's κακία is in ἐνέργεια, not in a passive state); 9.42; 12.27.

§ IIINotes

The radical Stoic thesis: between ἀρετή and κακία there is no middle ground. All human beings divide into sages (who possess all four virtues in full) and non-sages (who possess all four vices). There is no "in-between" (μέσος): the Stoics reject Aristotle's μεσότης (the doctrine of virtue as a mean). This yields a paradoxical consequence: almost everyone is vicious in the Stoic sense, because a sage appears more rarely than the phoenix (Sen. Ep. 42; SVF III 657).

The doctrine is softened by προκοπή — the gradual "progress" from folly toward wisdom. Most Stoics regarded themselves as προκόπτοντες — those making progress, not yet sages but moving in that direction. See Epict. Disc. 1.4 in full on προκοπή.

In Marcus, kakia occurs in the context of ignorance of TERMgood and TERMevil (02-01): vice is the consequence of incorrect evaluative knowledge, and therefore the right response to a vicious person is not anger but pity for his blindness (see also the image of moral blindness in 02-13).

Related5
Appears in12
4.3Men seek retreats for themselves, houses in the country, sea-shores, and mountains; and thou too art wont to desire such things very much. But this is altogethe…5.35If this is neither my own badness, nor an effect of my own badness, and the common weal is not injured, why am I troubled about it? And what is the harm to the …6.1The substance of the universe is obedient and compliant; and the reason which governs it has in itself no cause for doing evil, for it has no malice, nor does i…6.33Neither the labour which the hand does nor that of the foot is contrary to nature, so long as the foot does the foot's work and the hand the hand's. So then nei…7.1What is badness? It is that which thou hast often seen. And on the occasion of everything which happens keep this in mind, that it is that which thou hast often…7.31Adorn thyself with simplicity and modesty, and with indifference towards the things which lie between virtue and vice. Love mankind. Follow God. The poet says t…7.66How do we know if Telauges​ was not superior in character to Socrates? For it is not enough that Socrates died a more noble death, and disputed more skilfully w…7.71It is a ridiculous thing for a man not to fly from his own badness, which is indeed possible, but to fly from other men's badness, which is impossible. (Long)8.55Generally, wickedness does no harm at all to the universe; and particularly, the wickedness of one man does no harm to another. It is only harmful to him who ha…8.56To my own free will the free will of my neighbour is just as indifferent as his poor breath and flesh. For though we are made especially for the sake of one ano…9.2It would be a man's happiest lot to depart from mankind without having had any taste of lying and hypocrisy and luxury and pride. However to breathe out one's l…9.16Not in passivity, but in activity lie the evil and the good of the rational social animal, just as his virtue and his vice lie not in passivity, but in activity…
CopyPassage