MED. 4.20Discipline of assent
George Long · 1862EN · Long

Everything which is in any way DOGMAbeautiful is beautiful in itself, and terminates in itself, not having praise as part of itself. Neither worse then nor better is a thing made by being praised. I affirm this also of the things which are called beautiful by the vulgar, for example, material things and works of art. That which is really beautiful has no need of anything; not more than law, not more than truth, not more than benevolence or TERMmodesty. Which of these things is beautiful because it is praised, or spoiled by being blamed? Is such a thing as an emerald made worse than it was, if it is not praised? Or gold, ivory, purple, a lyre, a little knife, a flower, a shrub?

Original · ancient Greek

Πᾶν τὸ καὶ ὁπωσοῦν καλὸν ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ καλόν ἐστι καὶ ἐφ’ ἑαυτὸ καταλήγει, οὐκ ἔχον μέρος ἑαυτοῦ τὸν ἔπαινον· οὔτε γοῦν χεῖρον ἣ κρεῖττον γίνεται τὸ ἐπαινούμενον. τοῦτό φημι καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν κοινότερον καλῶν λεγομένων, οἷον ἐπὶ τῶν ὑλικῶν καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν τεχνικῶν κατασκευασμάτων (τὸ γὰρ δὴ ὄντως καλὸν τίνος χρείαν ἔχει; οὐ μᾶλλον ἣ νόμος, οὐ μᾶλλον ἣ ἀλήθεια, οὐ μᾶλλον ἢ εὔνοια ἢ αἰδώς)· τί τούτων διὰ τὸ ἐπαινεῖσθαι καλόν ἐστιν ἢ ψεγόμενον φθείρεται; σμαράγδιον γὰρ ἑαυτοῦ χεῖρον γίνεται, ἐὰν μὴ ἐπαινῆται; τί δὲ χρυσός, ἐλέφας, πορφύρα, λύρα, μαχαίριον, ἀνθύλλιον, δενδρύφιον;

Leopold · Teubner 1908
Commentary

Genre and place in the book. The close of the anti-fame series (after 04-19), but now at the level of value-theory: beauty and the good are self-valued (ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ); praise adds nothing to them. This is the foundation under 4.19: if the good is self-valued, posthumous repute is nothing it needs.

καλὸν ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ — beautiful of itself. The main thesis: everything καλόν is beautiful from itself and "terminates in itself" (ἐφ’ ἑαυτὸ καταλήγει); praise is no part of it (οὐκ ἔχον μέρος ἑαυτοῦ τὸν ἔπαινον). The praised is made no better, the blamed no worse. Value is intrinsic; repute is external and indifferent.

Two levels of καλόν. (1) "commonly called beautiful" — material things, works of art; (2) "the truly beautiful" (ὄντως καλόν) — law (νόμος), truth (ἀλήθεια), benevolence (εὔνοια), TERMmodesty / reverence (αἰδώς). Neither needs praise.

The emerald and the descending list. σμαράγδιον — an emerald is made no worse for being unpraised; nor gold, ivory, purple, a lyre, a little knife, a flower, a shrub. The list deliberately "descends" from the precious to the trivial: the argument grows stronger — if even a trinket loses nothing for want of praise, all the more the truly beautiful.

The link with self-sufficiency. The truly beautiful (= virtue) is self-sufficient: praise is no part of its good (cf. DOGMAvirtue-is-sufficient). Hence 5.6 (the good deed, like a vine bearing grapes, seeks no onlookers) and 7.73 (having done a good act, do not look for a "third thing" — recognition or a return).

The disciplines. The principal one is assent: the judgement that value is intrinsic and that praise or blame do not touch it. The secondary is desire: from it follows not craving praise (a continuation of 04-19).

Parallels. The good is self-valued, repute indifferent — 04-19; Med. 5.6; 7.73. The truly beautiful needs no praise — 03-06; cf. DOGMAvirtue-is-sufficient. Praise comes from others' opinion, not the thing's worth — 02-12; cf. the Stoic doctrine that the good is καλόν (beautiful) and choiceworthy for its own sake (DL 7.100–101).

DisciplineDiscipline of assent
Record added2026-06-25
Statuspublished
Discipline of assent

George Long · 1862· EN · Long

Everything which is in any way DOGMAbeautiful is beautiful in itself, and terminates in itself, not having praise as part of itself. Neither worse then nor better is a thing made by being praised. I affirm this also of the things which are called beautiful by the vulgar, for example, material things and works of art. That which is really beautiful has no need of anything; not more than law, not more than truth, not more than benevolence or TERMmodesty. Which of these things is beautiful because it is praised, or spoiled by being blamed? Is such a thing as an emerald made worse than it was, if it is not praised? Or gold, ivory, purple, a lyre, a little knife, a flower, a shrub?

Original · ancient Greek

Πᾶν τὸ καὶ ὁπωσοῦν καλὸν ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ καλόν ἐστι καὶ ἐφ’ ἑαυτὸ καταλήγει, οὐκ ἔχον μέρος ἑαυτοῦ τὸν ἔπαινον· οὔτε γοῦν χεῖρον ἣ κρεῖττον γίνεται τὸ ἐπαινούμενον. τοῦτό φημι καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν κοινότερον καλῶν λεγομένων, οἷον ἐπὶ τῶν ὑλικῶν καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν τεχνικῶν κατασκευασμάτων (τὸ γὰρ δὴ ὄντως καλὸν τίνος χρείαν ἔχει; οὐ μᾶλλον ἣ νόμος, οὐ μᾶλλον ἣ ἀλήθεια, οὐ μᾶλλον ἢ εὔνοια ἢ αἰδώς)· τί τούτων διὰ τὸ ἐπαινεῖσθαι καλόν ἐστιν ἢ ψεγόμενον φθείρεται; σμαράγδιον γὰρ ἑαυτοῦ χεῖρον γίνεται, ἐὰν μὴ ἐπαινῆται; τί δὲ χρυσός, ἐλέφας, πορφύρα, λύρα, μαχαίριον, ἀνθύλλιον, δενδρύφιον;

Leopold · Teubner 1908
Related2
Commentary

Genre and place in the book. The close of the anti-fame series (after 04-19), but now at the level of value-theory: beauty and the good are self-valued (ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ); praise adds nothing to them. This is the foundation under 4.19: if the good is self-valued, posthumous repute is nothing it needs.

καλὸν ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ — beautiful of itself. The main thesis: everything καλόν is beautiful from itself and "terminates in itself" (ἐφ’ ἑαυτὸ καταλήγει); praise is no part of it (οὐκ ἔχον μέρος ἑαυτοῦ τὸν ἔπαινον). The praised is made no better, the blamed no worse. Value is intrinsic; repute is external and indifferent.

Two levels of καλόν. (1) "commonly called beautiful" — material things, works of art; (2) "the truly beautiful" (ὄντως καλόν) — law (νόμος), truth (ἀλήθεια), benevolence (εὔνοια), TERMmodesty / reverence (αἰδώς). Neither needs praise.

The emerald and the descending list. σμαράγδιον — an emerald is made no worse for being unpraised; nor gold, ivory, purple, a lyre, a little knife, a flower, a shrub. The list deliberately "descends" from the precious to the trivial: the argument grows stronger — if even a trinket loses nothing for want of praise, all the more the truly beautiful.

The link with self-sufficiency. The truly beautiful (= virtue) is self-sufficient: praise is no part of its good (cf. DOGMAvirtue-is-sufficient). Hence 5.6 (the good deed, like a vine bearing grapes, seeks no onlookers) and 7.73 (having done a good act, do not look for a "third thing" — recognition or a return).

The disciplines. The principal one is assent: the judgement that value is intrinsic and that praise or blame do not touch it. The secondary is desire: from it follows not craving praise (a continuation of 04-19).

Parallels. The good is self-valued, repute indifferent — 04-19; Med. 5.6; 7.73. The truly beautiful needs no praise — 03-06; cf. DOGMAvirtue-is-sufficient. Praise comes from others' opinion, not the thing's worth — 02-12; cf. the Stoic doctrine that the good is καλόν (beautiful) and choiceworthy for its own sake (DL 7.100–101).

DisciplineDiscipline of assent
Record added2026-06-25
Statuspublished