MED. 9.42Discipline of action
George Long · 1862EN · Long

When thou art offended with any man's shameless conduct, immediately ask thyself, Is it possible, then, that shameless men should not be in the world? It is not possible. Do not, then, require what is impossible. For this man also is one of those shameless men who must of necessity be in the world. EXERCISELet the same considerations be present to thy mind in the case of the knave, and the faithless man, and of every man who TERMdoes wrong in any way. For at the same time that thou dost remind thyself that it is impossible that such kind of men should not exist, thou wilt become more kindly disposed towards every one individually.

It is useful to perceive this, too, immediately when the occasion arises, what TERMvirtue TERMnature has given to man to oppose to every wrongful act. For she has given to man, as an antidote against the stupid man, mildness, and against another kind of man some other power. And in all cases it is possible for thee to correct by teaching the man who is gone astray; for TERMevery man who errs misses his object and is gone astray. DOGMABesides wherein hast thou been injured? For thou wilt find that no one among those against whom thou art irritated has done anything by which thy mind could be made worse;

TERMbut that which is evil to thee and harmful has its foundation only in the mind. And what harm is done or what is there strange, if the man who has not been instructed does the acts of an uninstructed man? Consider whether thou shouldst not rather blame thyself, because thou didst not expect such a man to err in such a way. For thou hadst means given thee by thy TERMreason to suppose that it was likely that he would commit this error, and yet thou hast forgotten and art amazed that he has erred.

But most of all when thou blamest a man as faithless or ungrateful, turn to thyself. For the TERMfault is manifestly thy own, whether thou didst trust that a man who had such a disposition would keep his promise, or when conferring thy kindness thou didst not confer it absolutely, nor yet in such way as to have received from thy very act all the profit. For what more dost thou want when thou hast done a man a service? Art thou not content that thou hast done something DOGMAconformable to thy nature, DOGMAand dost thou seek to be paid for it? MOTIFJust as if the eye demanded a recompense for seeing, or the feet for walking. For as these members are formed for a particular purpose, and by working according to their several constitutions obtain what is their own; so also as man is formed by nature to acts of benevolence, when he has done anything benevolent or in any other way TERMconducive to the common interest, he has acted conformably to his constitution, and he gets what is his own.

Original · ancient Greek

Ὅταν τινὸς ἀναισχυντίᾳ προσκόπτῃς, εὐθὺς πυνθάνου σεαυτοῦ· δύνανται οὖν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ ἀναίσχυντοι μὴ εἶναι; οὐ δύνανται· μὴ οὖν ἀπαίτει τὸ ἀδύνατον· εἷς γὰρ καὶ οὗτός ἐστιν ἐκείνων τῶν ἀναισχύντων, οὓς ἀνάγκη ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ εἶναι. τὸ δ’ αὐτὸ καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ πανούργου καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀπίστου καὶ παντὸς τοῦ ὁτιοῦν ἁμαρτάνοντος ἔστω σοι πρόχειρον· ἅμα γὰρ τῷ ὑπομνησθῆναι ὅτι τὸ γένος τῶν τοιούτων ἀδύνατόν ἐστι μὴ ὑπάρχειν, εὐμενέστερος ἔσῃ πρὸς τοὺς καθ’ ἕνα.

εὔχρηστον δὲ κἀκεῖνο εὐθὺς ἐννοεῖν, τίνα ἔδωκεν ἡ φύσις τῷ ἀνθρώπῳ ἀρετὴν πρὸς τοῦτο τὸ ἁμάρτημα· ἔδωκε γὰρ ὡς ἀντιφάρμακον πρὸς μὲν τὸν ἀγνώμονα τὴν πρᾳότητα, πρὸς δὲ ἄλλον ἄλλην τινὰ δύναμιν, ὅλως δὲ ἔξεστί σοι μεταδιδάσκειν τὸν πεπλανημένον· πᾶς γὰρ ὁ ἁμαρτάνων ἀφαμαρτάνει τοῦ προκειμένου καὶ πεπλάνηται. τί δὲ καὶ βέβλαψαι; εὑρήσεις γὰρ μηδένα τούτων, πρὸς οὓς παροξύνῃ, πεποιηκότα τι τοιοῦτον, ἐξ οὗ ἡ διάνοιά σου χείρων ἔμελλε γενήσεσθαι·

τὸ δὲ κακόν σου καὶ τὸ βλαβερὸν ἐνταῦθα πᾶσαν τὴν ὑπόστασιν ἔχει. τί δὲ καινὸν ἢ ξένον γέγονεν, εἰ ὁ ἀπαίδευτος τὰ τοῦ ἀπαιδεύτου πράσσει; ὅρα μὴ σεαυτῷ μᾶλλον ἐγκαλεῖν ὀφείλῃς, ὅτι οὐ προσεδόκησας τοῦτον τοῦτο ἁμαρτήσεσθαι· σὺ γὰρ καὶ ἀφορμὰς ἐκ τοῦ λόγου εἶχες πρὸς τὸ ἐνθυμηθῆναι ὅτι εἰκός ἐστι τοῦτον τοῦτο ἁμαρτήσεσθαι, καὶ ὅμως ἐπιλαθόμενος θαυμάζεις εἰ ἡμάρτηκε.

μάλιστα δέ, ὅταν ὡς ἀπίστῳ ἢ ἀχαρίστῳ μέμφῃ, εἰς σεαυτὸν ἐπιστρέφου· προδήλως γὰρ σὸν τὸ ἁμάρτημα, εἴτε περὶ τοῦ τοιαύτην τὴν διάθεσιν ἔχοντος ἐπίστευσας ὅτι τὴν πίστιν φυλάξει, εἴτε τὴν χάριν διδοὺς μὴ καταληκτικῶς ἔδωκας μηδὲ ὥστε ἐξ αὐτῆς τῆς πράξεως εὐθὺς ἀπειληφέναι πάντα τὸν καρπόν. τί γὰρ πλέον θέλεις εὖ ποιήσας ἄνθρωπον; οὐκ ἀρκεῖ τοῦτο, ὅτι κατὰ φύσιν τὴν σήν τι ἔπραξας, ἀλλὰ τούτου μισθὸν ζητεῖς; ὡσεὶ ὁ ὀφθαλμὸς ἀμοιβὴν ἀπῄτει, ὅτι βλέπει, ἢ οἱ πόδες, ὅτι βαδίζουσιν. ὥσπερ γὰρ ταῦτα πρὸς τόδε τι γέγονεν, ὅπερ κατὰ τὴν ἰδίαν κατασκευὴν ἐνεργοῦντα ἀπέχει τὸ ἴδιον, οὕτως καὶ ὁ ἄνθρωπος εὐεργετικὸς πεφυκώς, ὁπόταν τι εὐεργετικὸν ἢ ἄλλως εἰς τὰ μέσα συνεργητικὸν πράξῃ, πεποίηκε, πρὸς ὃ κατεσκεύασται, καὶ ἔχει τὸ ἑαυτοῦ.

Leopold · Teubner 1908
Commentary

First move: do not demand the impossible. The longest passage in the book and the most systematic: not an aphorism but a protocol of five successive devices against anger. The first is modal — meeting another's shamelessness (ἀναισχυντία), ask yourself whether it is possible that there be no shameless men in the world. It is not — therefore μὴ ἀπαίτει τὸ ἀδύνατον, "do not demand the impossible." Anger is exposed here as a logical error: it demands that a kind of thing not exist, and that this specimen not belong to its kind. The same argument at 5.17 and 4.6 (the image of the fig-tree that has juice). Marcus expressly orders this kept EXERCISE"ready to hand" (πρόχειρον) for the knave, the faithless man, and everyone who TERMdoes wrong — a formula as instrument, not a one-off observation. The result of the first move is stated not as "endure" but as εὐμενέστερος ἔσῃ — "you will become kinder."

Second move: every vice has its antidote. TERMNature has given man, against each fault, the corresponding TERMvirtue as an ἀντιφάρμακον: against the ἀγνώμων (the unfeeling, ungrateful man) — πρᾳότης, gentleness; against another sort, some other power. Anger is thus not only a logical error but an unused instrument: the needed quality already lies at hand. Hence the third move, the pedagogical one: μεταδιδάσκειν, to "re-teach" the man gone astray, since TERMeveryone who errs "misses the mark set before him" (ἀφαμαρτάνει τοῦ προκειμένου) and is therefore in error rather than in malice (cf. 9.11: correct by teaching if you can; and the gods too are indulgent to such men).

Third move: but have you been harmed? τί δὲ καὶ βέβλαψαι; — the question that turns the conversation from the offender back to oneself. None of those at whom you boil has done anything DOGMAby which your διάνοια would become worse; and TERM"your evil and what is harmful to you" has its whole ὑπόστασις precisely there — in the ruling part, and nowhere else. Hence the fourth move, the counter-reproach: what is καινὸν ἢ ξένον in it, if the uninstructed man (ἀπαίδευτος) does what an uninstructed man does? The blame is rather yours — you did not expect it, though TERMreason gave you every ἀφορμή ("point of purchase") for foreseeing that this man would do exactly this. You forgot, and are amazed. This is premeditation in its negative form: anger is the price of failing to reckon.

Fifth move: the kindness given outright. The subtlest part. When you complain of faithlessness or ingratitude, "turn to yourself" (εἰς σεαυτὸν ἐπιστρέφου): the fault is doubly yours — either you trusted a man of that disposition (διάθεσις), expecting fidelity against his constitution, or you gave the kindness "not conclusively" (μὴ καταληκτικῶς), not in such a way as to take the whole fruit from the act itself. The second is the Stoic core: DOGMAthe wage of a virtuous act is the act, and to require more is DOGMAto miss that an action "according to your own nature" is already complete. Hence the image: MOTIFthe eye does not demand a recompense for seeing, nor the feet for walking. As the organs, working according to their own constitution (κατὰ τὴν ἰδίαν κατασκευήν), "have what is their own", so man, born εὐεργετικός, having done something benevolent or otherwise TERMco-operative, has already "done what he was constituted for, and has what is his own" (ἔχει τὸ ἑαυτοῦ). Cf. 7.73 and 7.74; the nine-headed "therapy of anger" at Med. 11.18. The governing discipline is action, the sustaining one assent.

Notes on Long's version. Three places where Long departs from the Greek and the modernization has been brought back to the original: (1) ἀγνώμων means "unfeeling, ungrateful", not "the stupid man"; (2) τί δὲ καινὸν ἢ ξένον γέγονεν is "what new or strange thing has happened", where Long introduces a superfluous "what harm is done"; (3) εἰς τὰ μέσα συνεργητικόν is "co-operative in the sphere of the intermediate (indifferent) things", the technical Stoic τὰ μέσα, smoothed by Long into "conducive to the common interest". In (3) Rogovin follows Long's sense («общему благу») — kept verbatim.

DisciplineDiscipline of action
Record added2026-07-16
Statuspublished
Discipline of action

George Long · 1862· EN · Long

When thou art offended with any man's shameless conduct, immediately ask thyself, Is it possible, then, that shameless men should not be in the world? It is not possible. Do not, then, require what is impossible. For this man also is one of those shameless men who must of necessity be in the world. EXERCISELet the same considerations be present to thy mind in the case of the knave, and the faithless man, and of every man who TERMdoes wrong in any way. For at the same time that thou dost remind thyself that it is impossible that such kind of men should not exist, thou wilt become more kindly disposed towards every one individually.

It is useful to perceive this, too, immediately when the occasion arises, what TERMvirtue TERMnature has given to man to oppose to every wrongful act. For she has given to man, as an antidote against the stupid man, mildness, and against another kind of man some other power. And in all cases it is possible for thee to correct by teaching the man who is gone astray; for TERMevery man who errs misses his object and is gone astray. DOGMABesides wherein hast thou been injured? For thou wilt find that no one among those against whom thou art irritated has done anything by which thy mind could be made worse;

TERMbut that which is evil to thee and harmful has its foundation only in the mind. And what harm is done or what is there strange, if the man who has not been instructed does the acts of an uninstructed man? Consider whether thou shouldst not rather blame thyself, because thou didst not expect such a man to err in such a way. For thou hadst means given thee by thy TERMreason to suppose that it was likely that he would commit this error, and yet thou hast forgotten and art amazed that he has erred.

But most of all when thou blamest a man as faithless or ungrateful, turn to thyself. For the TERMfault is manifestly thy own, whether thou didst trust that a man who had such a disposition would keep his promise, or when conferring thy kindness thou didst not confer it absolutely, nor yet in such way as to have received from thy very act all the profit. For what more dost thou want when thou hast done a man a service? Art thou not content that thou hast done something DOGMAconformable to thy nature, DOGMAand dost thou seek to be paid for it? MOTIFJust as if the eye demanded a recompense for seeing, or the feet for walking. For as these members are formed for a particular purpose, and by working according to their several constitutions obtain what is their own; so also as man is formed by nature to acts of benevolence, when he has done anything benevolent or in any other way TERMconducive to the common interest, he has acted conformably to his constitution, and he gets what is his own.

Original · ancient Greek

Ὅταν τινὸς ἀναισχυντίᾳ προσκόπτῃς, εὐθὺς πυνθάνου σεαυτοῦ· δύνανται οὖν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ ἀναίσχυντοι μὴ εἶναι; οὐ δύνανται· μὴ οὖν ἀπαίτει τὸ ἀδύνατον· εἷς γὰρ καὶ οὗτός ἐστιν ἐκείνων τῶν ἀναισχύντων, οὓς ἀνάγκη ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ εἶναι. τὸ δ’ αὐτὸ καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ πανούργου καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀπίστου καὶ παντὸς τοῦ ὁτιοῦν ἁμαρτάνοντος ἔστω σοι πρόχειρον· ἅμα γὰρ τῷ ὑπομνησθῆναι ὅτι τὸ γένος τῶν τοιούτων ἀδύνατόν ἐστι μὴ ὑπάρχειν, εὐμενέστερος ἔσῃ πρὸς τοὺς καθ’ ἕνα.

εὔχρηστον δὲ κἀκεῖνο εὐθὺς ἐννοεῖν, τίνα ἔδωκεν ἡ φύσις τῷ ἀνθρώπῳ ἀρετὴν πρὸς τοῦτο τὸ ἁμάρτημα· ἔδωκε γὰρ ὡς ἀντιφάρμακον πρὸς μὲν τὸν ἀγνώμονα τὴν πρᾳότητα, πρὸς δὲ ἄλλον ἄλλην τινὰ δύναμιν, ὅλως δὲ ἔξεστί σοι μεταδιδάσκειν τὸν πεπλανημένον· πᾶς γὰρ ὁ ἁμαρτάνων ἀφαμαρτάνει τοῦ προκειμένου καὶ πεπλάνηται. τί δὲ καὶ βέβλαψαι; εὑρήσεις γὰρ μηδένα τούτων, πρὸς οὓς παροξύνῃ, πεποιηκότα τι τοιοῦτον, ἐξ οὗ ἡ διάνοιά σου χείρων ἔμελλε γενήσεσθαι·

τὸ δὲ κακόν σου καὶ τὸ βλαβερὸν ἐνταῦθα πᾶσαν τὴν ὑπόστασιν ἔχει. τί δὲ καινὸν ἢ ξένον γέγονεν, εἰ ὁ ἀπαίδευτος τὰ τοῦ ἀπαιδεύτου πράσσει; ὅρα μὴ σεαυτῷ μᾶλλον ἐγκαλεῖν ὀφείλῃς, ὅτι οὐ προσεδόκησας τοῦτον τοῦτο ἁμαρτήσεσθαι· σὺ γὰρ καὶ ἀφορμὰς ἐκ τοῦ λόγου εἶχες πρὸς τὸ ἐνθυμηθῆναι ὅτι εἰκός ἐστι τοῦτον τοῦτο ἁμαρτήσεσθαι, καὶ ὅμως ἐπιλαθόμενος θαυμάζεις εἰ ἡμάρτηκε.

μάλιστα δέ, ὅταν ὡς ἀπίστῳ ἢ ἀχαρίστῳ μέμφῃ, εἰς σεαυτὸν ἐπιστρέφου· προδήλως γὰρ σὸν τὸ ἁμάρτημα, εἴτε περὶ τοῦ τοιαύτην τὴν διάθεσιν ἔχοντος ἐπίστευσας ὅτι τὴν πίστιν φυλάξει, εἴτε τὴν χάριν διδοὺς μὴ καταληκτικῶς ἔδωκας μηδὲ ὥστε ἐξ αὐτῆς τῆς πράξεως εὐθὺς ἀπειληφέναι πάντα τὸν καρπόν. τί γὰρ πλέον θέλεις εὖ ποιήσας ἄνθρωπον; οὐκ ἀρκεῖ τοῦτο, ὅτι κατὰ φύσιν τὴν σήν τι ἔπραξας, ἀλλὰ τούτου μισθὸν ζητεῖς; ὡσεὶ ὁ ὀφθαλμὸς ἀμοιβὴν ἀπῄτει, ὅτι βλέπει, ἢ οἱ πόδες, ὅτι βαδίζουσιν. ὥσπερ γὰρ ταῦτα πρὸς τόδε τι γέγονεν, ὅπερ κατὰ τὴν ἰδίαν κατασκευὴν ἐνεργοῦντα ἀπέχει τὸ ἴδιον, οὕτως καὶ ὁ ἄνθρωπος εὐεργετικὸς πεφυκώς, ὁπόταν τι εὐεργετικὸν ἢ ἄλλως εἰς τὰ μέσα συνεργητικὸν πράξῃ, πεποίηκε, πρὸς ὃ κατεσκεύασται, καὶ ἔχει τὸ ἑαυτοῦ.

Leopold · Teubner 1908
Related11
Commentary

First move: do not demand the impossible. The longest passage in the book and the most systematic: not an aphorism but a protocol of five successive devices against anger. The first is modal — meeting another's shamelessness (ἀναισχυντία), ask yourself whether it is possible that there be no shameless men in the world. It is not — therefore μὴ ἀπαίτει τὸ ἀδύνατον, "do not demand the impossible." Anger is exposed here as a logical error: it demands that a kind of thing not exist, and that this specimen not belong to its kind. The same argument at 5.17 and 4.6 (the image of the fig-tree that has juice). Marcus expressly orders this kept EXERCISE"ready to hand" (πρόχειρον) for the knave, the faithless man, and everyone who TERMdoes wrong — a formula as instrument, not a one-off observation. The result of the first move is stated not as "endure" but as εὐμενέστερος ἔσῃ — "you will become kinder."

Second move: every vice has its antidote. TERMNature has given man, against each fault, the corresponding TERMvirtue as an ἀντιφάρμακον: against the ἀγνώμων (the unfeeling, ungrateful man) — πρᾳότης, gentleness; against another sort, some other power. Anger is thus not only a logical error but an unused instrument: the needed quality already lies at hand. Hence the third move, the pedagogical one: μεταδιδάσκειν, to "re-teach" the man gone astray, since TERMeveryone who errs "misses the mark set before him" (ἀφαμαρτάνει τοῦ προκειμένου) and is therefore in error rather than in malice (cf. 9.11: correct by teaching if you can; and the gods too are indulgent to such men).

Third move: but have you been harmed? τί δὲ καὶ βέβλαψαι; — the question that turns the conversation from the offender back to oneself. None of those at whom you boil has done anything DOGMAby which your διάνοια would become worse; and TERM"your evil and what is harmful to you" has its whole ὑπόστασις precisely there — in the ruling part, and nowhere else. Hence the fourth move, the counter-reproach: what is καινὸν ἢ ξένον in it, if the uninstructed man (ἀπαίδευτος) does what an uninstructed man does? The blame is rather yours — you did not expect it, though TERMreason gave you every ἀφορμή ("point of purchase") for foreseeing that this man would do exactly this. You forgot, and are amazed. This is premeditation in its negative form: anger is the price of failing to reckon.

Fifth move: the kindness given outright. The subtlest part. When you complain of faithlessness or ingratitude, "turn to yourself" (εἰς σεαυτὸν ἐπιστρέφου): the fault is doubly yours — either you trusted a man of that disposition (διάθεσις), expecting fidelity against his constitution, or you gave the kindness "not conclusively" (μὴ καταληκτικῶς), not in such a way as to take the whole fruit from the act itself. The second is the Stoic core: DOGMAthe wage of a virtuous act is the act, and to require more is DOGMAto miss that an action "according to your own nature" is already complete. Hence the image: MOTIFthe eye does not demand a recompense for seeing, nor the feet for walking. As the organs, working according to their own constitution (κατὰ τὴν ἰδίαν κατασκευήν), "have what is their own", so man, born εὐεργετικός, having done something benevolent or otherwise TERMco-operative, has already "done what he was constituted for, and has what is his own" (ἔχει τὸ ἑαυτοῦ). Cf. 7.73 and 7.74; the nine-headed "therapy of anger" at Med. 11.18. The governing discipline is action, the sustaining one assent.

Notes on Long's version. Three places where Long departs from the Greek and the modernization has been brought back to the original: (1) ἀγνώμων means "unfeeling, ungrateful", not "the stupid man"; (2) τί δὲ καινὸν ἢ ξένον γέγονεν is "what new or strange thing has happened", where Long introduces a superfluous "what harm is done"; (3) εἰς τὰ μέσα συνεργητικόν is "co-operative in the sphere of the intermediate (indifferent) things", the technical Stoic τὰ μέσα, smoothed by Long into "conducive to the common interest". In (3) Rogovin follows Long's sense («общему благу») — kept verbatim.

DisciplineDiscipline of action
Record added2026-07-16
Statuspublished